The Rabbit I Pulled Out Of My Hat

February 22, 2009

an old experiment

Filed under: writing — Tags: , , , — Paul Crittenden @ 5:06 am

The following is a fiction experiment I’ve been playing around with since the fall of 2001. It’s one of those ideas that just never seems to go away. Or feel finished. Who knows what it may end up being. Maybe part of something bigger. Maybe broken down and used as parts. Or maybe I’ll just leave it as is. Anyway, I’d love to hear what other people think of it.

“Meet-cute”

About six other cars are parked irregularly on the gray pebbles scattered about the gravel parking lot. I’m not really sure where I should stop my car. Will block someone in? Screw it, I’m parking right here. If somebody has a problem with that, they can ask me to move.

As I go through the ritual of getting out of my car (Keys in my front pocket. Lights off? Has my wallet fallen out of my back pocket and slipped through the opening between the top and bottom portions of the driver’s seat, landing on the floorboard and thus being lost forever, strewn about my car to God Knows Where? Are my keys still in my front pocket? Rearview mirror: Does my hair look all right? Yes, everything seems to be in place, I guess.) I keep looking at the building that belongs to this gravel parking lot. It looks like it was once a cheap motel. There are a number of doors and windows on its two floors and I can just make out some movement behind the curtains on either end of the gray building. Even though I’ve never been here before, I know exactly which door I’m supposed to use: Second floor, right in the middle. Two flights of stairs lead from the far left and right of the parking lot to that door. The stairs are an arrowhead pointing toward my destination. I lock my car door and head to the closest stairway: the one on the left.

Who am I meeting behind this door? I know I’m supposed to be here – plans have been made – but I can’t remember why. I may not know anything else, but I know this: The people I’m meeting on the other side of this door want something from me.

Am I supposed to knock or just go in? I knock. After a few seconds nobody answers. If I wanted to, this would be the perfect opportunity to leave. “I knocked and nobody answered. I didn’t think anybody was there so I left.” That would be a reasonable explanation for my absence. Even as the thought enters my head I turn the doorknob.

This is a large room: an auditorium of some kind. At the far end of the room there is a small stage with a black half-curtain drawn. On either side of the stage are doors leading backstage. The room is full of high school luchroom tables. Some are folded in half so that they can be pushed to the boundaries of the room to rest against the walls and free up some floor space. The have round seats: some blue, some red. There are three other people in the auditorium with me. A man is sitting on the seat closest to center stage looking up at two girls who rest on the boards with the black scrim behind them. The girls are reading to each other from pieces of paper that are stapled together. The man hears my footsteps or my breathing and spins around to give me a smile. He is blond and built like a surfer or maybe a soccer player: all tousled hair, calf muscles, and tan. The girls ignore us and continue to run their lines. The guy and I walk toward each other, navigating the sea of lunchroom tables. We meet in the middle of the auditorium.

“We’re glad you made it. Have a seat. I’ll be right back with Allie and we’ll get started.” The guy exits the room through a door to the right of the stage. When he opens the door I can hear music coming from some room that is, for now, hidden behind the stage.

I walk over to a chair closer to the stage so I can hear what the girls are saying to each other. They are quite lovely, beautiful even, but in different ways. One of them has black hair that hangs just above her jawline. She has smallish breasts; her shapely arms and toned calf muscles are signs that she works out. The other is a blonde that will never need to work out. She has a classic voluptuousness that will remain with her even when she is old and all of her friends have become maybe a little fat. Both of the girls have cold blue eyes. They stop talking and watch me quietly as I move to the front row center seat recently occupied by the soccer-surfer. When they are satisfied that I am comfortable they smile at me and resume their lines.

The blonde: “Where do you want to start?”

“How about 7a, right after your line, ‘What now?’”

“’Kay.”

For the first time I notice that the blonde is lying between the black-haired girl’s legs. She’s just reclining there with her back against the brunette’s pert breasts. Blonde turns to black and whispers her line: “What now?”

The black-haired, athletic beauty brings the other girl’s face to her red lips by grabbing a fistful of blonde hair. Blonde whispers, “Rose…” and moves her hand to that perfect jaw line, brushing black strands of hair away.

The surfer reappears from the stage right door with a new girl wearing glasses with black plastic frames, a white t-shirt, blue jeans, and brown hair. They walk over to my table, the new girl sitting next to me, surfer-soccer sitting across from me. They don’t even notice the scene being acted out on the stage not three feet from their heads.

The guy says, “This is Allison… well, Allie. She’ll be your guide tonight. Show you the ropes, you know?”

Allie has the darkest brown eyes I’ve ever seen. They are almost completely black. I can’t help but stare. I am looking into two black holes that reflect my face, caught in an immense gravity. The she starts talking to me. “I’m sure you’ll like it here. Let me show you around. Get you acquainted.”

We walk to the door at the left of the stage. The pair onstage has apparently ended their exercise and are intensely studying their stapled stacks of paper. The guy stays in his seat and starts talking to them as Allie and I make our exit.

There is a long hallway going off to the left and right behind the stage. Along this hallway are many doors on either side, some are open with music and loud voices coming from inside rooms, and some are shut. However I get the feeling that every room is occupied. I wonder for a moment how so many people could so obviously be here with so few cars in the parking lot outside.

Occasionally people come from one room and go into another or turn right back around and go back into the same room they just left. They are dressed in all sorts of styles. Some are wearing dirt- and oil-stained flannels and others are wearing evening gown or tuxedos, even wedding gowns. And every style in between.

I turn to ask Allie about the wide variety of fashion but before I can get a word out she asks me first, “Have you ever been to the northwest?”

“Like Oregon or Washington state? Mt. Hood, that kind of thing?”

“Right.”

“No. But I’ve always wanted to go. It seems nice. Far away.”

“But it rains a lot.”

“Yeah, I guess so.”

As we are talking we turn right and start to walk down the hallway. We pass three or four doors on our left and stop at the one with the loudest music coming from behind it. Allie turns the knob and we enter.

Seven people are sitting on comfortable-seeming giant beanbags or on reclining chairs. At one end of the room is a massive sound system and there are expensive speakers up in every corner and against the walls. The people in the room are talking to each other about the music. As Allie and I walk in, everyone turns and looks at me with smiles on their faces. A couple on the floor to our left make room for us. We sit down on a huge pink beanbag and settle in. Allie is sitting very close to me. Her gum smells like strawberries.

A man in tan pants and a button-up shirt is sitting in a chair next to the stereo asking everybody in the room what they thing about the music. He looks at me. “What do you think?”

“It’s all right,” I say, really only paying attention to the music for the first time. “I mean, I wouldn’t spend money on it or anything. It’s a little, uh, edgy for my tastes I guess. Which is fine sometimes, but I have to take it in small does at the right time, you know?”

“So you don’t like it?”

“Well, that’s not what I’m saying. I’m just saying it’s not something I would usually buy at a record store or whatever. But it has its place I suppose.”

“Right. You don’t like it.”

A guy on the other side of the room hands the man in the tan pants a CD and says, “Pat, let’s give this a try.”

Pat, which is obviously the man in tan pants’ name, ejects the CD that is playing, cutting the cacophony off abruptly. He places the new CD in the tray and presses a button. The girl sitting next to the who picked out the CD squeals, “Ooh, I love these guys!” And the music starts.

The song is all rhythmic, jangly electric guitar with a simple drum part and a slightly off-key male vocalist. In most ways it’s the opposite of the CD that was just played. Instead of an angry, screaming, incomprehensible front man, the new song is simple and about loss. In the middle of the song the simple structure breaks down and a lush, warm orchestral arrangement takes over. The off-key vocalist is still singing his lament with all his heart but with the new orchestration I get a hopeful feeling. The fact that the singer has so perfectly identified his situation means that he is now above it.

I am the first one to speak when the song is over. “I like it. It sounds like something I would have listened to yesterday.”

Allie turns and her face is very close to mine… strawberries…

She whispers, “So you wouldn’t listen to it today?”

I think about this for a moment. “No, I don’t think I would. But I can imagine listening to it some time in the future.”

Allie wrinkles her nose. “Hmm…”

Pat is saying, “Fair enough,” as Allie lies back on the beanbag and puts her arm around my waist. The next song on the CD begins with the same lush symphonic sound. It’s all strings and tympani rolls and it’s just about the most beautiful thing I have ever heard. It’s like the soundtrack to a twenty-first century Fellini movie. The big finale scene on some Italian beach and everybody you’ve met so far is there. I smile and lean back on the beanbag, getting even closer to Allie. She says, “Why don’t we let the new guy pick one? He’s had to sit here and listen to our stuff. Give him the list, Pat.” He hands me a typewritten list of artists and names of discs. The list is huge – at least 20 pages long.

I say, “What we’re listening to now is good, actually.”

“Look, you have to pick something else out. Otherwise how are we supposed to judge all of this music?” Pat shakes his copy of the CD list at me good-naturedly.

So I pick out some trip-hop. Lounging on the beanbag with Allie seems like the perfect time for some jazzy loops and a Roland drum machine. A female voice sings abstractly sexy lines behind a wash of distorted guitar. The tempo is languid and strings start to swell in the background. Impossibly, Allie moves even closer to me. The beanbag protests but she finds a way to get closer. As she is burrowing each of the other people in the room starts to leave. The are all smiling and telling me they are glad to meet me.

Within moments Allie and I are alone. The slow throb of the music seems to come from everywhere. “You know,” she whispers to me, “we’re all going to Greece tomorrow. Want to come?”

Fin.

November 26, 2008

In which Neil Gaiman’s fingerprints abound

Filed under: Biographical, music, writing — Tags: , , , — Paul Crittenden @ 4:45 am

So when I got home from tonight I went on YouTube to check out Amanda Palmer. Neil Gaiman pimps her in his blog and has worked with her so I thought what the heck. It’s good stuff. I guess her solo stuff and her work with The Dresden Dolls is similar. People call it “alt-goth” but I don’t see it. Maybe I don’t really know what “goth” means. Maybe “goth” is just pancake makeup. Anyway, I like her music. And I like what I’ve heard of The Dresden Dolls. Torch songs with dramatic flourishes. Thoughtful, heart-on-the-sleeve lyrics. I have a feeling this kind of music is big in gay circles. So what.

Amanda Palmer has this really cool series of videos that go along with her album, Who Killed Amanda Palmer. You should check them out. Here’s one:

I’ve been listening to music and reading things (Bones of the Moon by Jonathan Carroll) that are making me want to write again. Oh my lord is this getting to be an old whine. So why don’t I just start writing again? I’ll tell you why: I’m not a naturally-disciplined individual. Maybe I’m worried that I will lose my spontaneity/free-spiritedness if I try to become more disciplined. Well, the truth is I’m not doing crap unless I make myself do it. I read somewhere that being a writer is like having homework every day for the rest of your life. Wow. Really hits home vis-a-vis the discipline thing, eh? I really really really want to start writing again. And I know the only way I’ll do that is if I actually sit down every day and do it. It’s like I’ve reached this point where I’m this close to being actually happy with who I am. And I’m sure what’s missing is the writing thing. So why don’t I just do it?

Bonus Amanda Palmer vid (this one’s NSFW):

September 18, 2008

RIP David Foster Wallace

Filed under: books — Tags: , , , — Paul Crittenden @ 7:09 pm

I was floored to find out that David Foster Wallace had committed suicide. He was, without a doubt, one of our most treasured authors. Everything he wrote was worth reading. I could spend countless words going on about how his Infinite Jest changed my life. (I was actually in the hospital going through detox as I was reading it. The only other time I had experienced synchronicity of that order was as I was reading Don DeLillo’s Underworld on 9/11/01.) But in order to really get it, you have to read him. Harper’s has put up everything he’d ever written for them. But considering the election season, I wanted to post an excerpt from an interview DFW did with The Believer in 2003. (Yes, it’s Dave Eggers interviewing David Foster Wallace. Which is some kind of literary hipster pornography.)

The reason why doing political writing is so hard right now is probably also the reason why more young (am I included in the range of this predicate anymore?) fiction writers ought to be doing it. As of 2003, the rhetoric of the enterprise is fucked. 95 percent of political commentary, whether spoken or written, is now polluted by the very politics it’s supposed to be about. Meaning it’s become totally ideological and reductive: The writer/speaker has certain political convictions or affiliations, and proceeds to filter all reality and spin all assertion according to those convictions and loyalties. Everybody’s pissed off and exasperated and impervious to argument from any other side. Opposing viewpoints are not just incorrect but contemptible, corrupt, evil. Conservative thinkers are balder about this kind of attitude: Limbaugh, Hannity, that horrific O’Reilly person. Coulter, Kristol, etc. But the Left’s been infected, too. Have you read this new Al Franken book? Parts of it are funny, but it’s totally venomous (like, what possible response can rightist pundits have to Franken’s broadsides but further rage and return-venom?). Or see also e.g. Lapham’s latest Harper’s columns, or most of the stuff in the Nation, or even Rolling Stone. It’s all become like Zinn and Chomsky but without the immense bodies of hard data these older guys use to back up their screeds. There’s no more complex, messy, community-wide argument (or “dialogue”); political discourse is now a formulaic matter of preaching to one’s own choir and demonizing the opposition. Everything’s relentlessly black-and-whitened. Since the truth is way, way more gray and complicated than any one ideology can capture, the whole thing seems to me not just stupid but stupefying. Watching O’Reilly v. Franken is watching bloodsport. How can any of this possibly help me, the average citizen, deliberate about whom to choose to decide my country’s macroeconomic policy, or how even to conceive for myself what that policy’s outlines should be, or how to minimize the chances of North Korea nuking the DMZ and pulling us into a ghastly foreign war, or how to balance domestic security concerns with civil liberties? Questions like these are all massively complicated, and much of the complication is not sexy, and well over 90 percent of political commentary now simply abets the uncomplicatedly sexy delusion that one side is Right and Just and the other Wrong and Dangerous. Which is of course a pleasant delusion, in a way—as is the belief that every last person you’re in conflict with is an asshole—but it’s childish, and totally unconducive to hard thought, give and take, compromise, or the ability of grown-ups to function as any kind of community.

My own belief, perhaps starry-eyed, is that since fictionists or literary-type writers are supposed to have some special interest in empathy, in trying to imagine what it’s like to be the other guy, they might have some useful part to play in a political conversation that’s having the problems ours is. Failing that, maybe at least we can help elevate some professional political journalists who are (1) polite, and (2) willing to entertain the possibility that intelligent, well-meaning people can disagree, and (3) able to countenance the fact that some problems are simply beyond the ability of a single ideology to represent accurately.

Implicit in this brief, shrill answer, though, is obviously the idea that at least some political writing should be Platonically disinterested, should rise above the fray, etc.; and in my own present case this is impossible (and so I am a hypocrite, an ideological opponent could say). In doing the McCain piece you mentioned, I saw some stuff (more accurately: I believe that I saw some stuff) about our current president, his inner circle, and the primary campaign they ran that prompted certain reactions inside me that make it impossible to rise above the fray. I am, at present, partisan. Worse than that: I feel such deep, visceral antipathy that I can’t seem to think or speak or write in any kind of fair or nuanced way about the current administration. Writing-wise, I think this kind of interior state is dangerous. It is when one feels most strongly, most personally, that it’s most tempting to speak up (“speak out” is the current verb phrase of choice, rhetorically freighted as it is). But it’s also when it’s the least productive, or at any rate it seems that way to me—there are plenty of writers and journalists “speaking out” and writing pieces about oligarchy and neofascism and mendacity and appalling short-sightedness in definitions of “national security” and “national interest,” etc., and very few of these writers seem to me to be generating helpful or powerful pieces, or really even being persuasive to anyone who doesn’t already share the writer’s views.

My own plan for the coming fourteen months is to knock on doors and stuff envelopes. Maybe even to wear a button. To try to accrete with others into a demographically significant mass. To try extra hard to exercise patience, politeness, and imagination on those with whom I disagree. Also to floss more.

June 25, 2008

McSweeney’s fun

Filed under: Humor — Tags: , , , — Paul Crittenden @ 3:12 pm

If you’ve been paying attention, you’ll know that I love McSweeney’s. A few days ago they had a feature called, “Lit 101 Class in Three Lines or Less.” Here’s my favorite one:

The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

C.S. LEWIS: Finally, a utopia ruled by children and populated by talking animals.

THE WITCH: Hi, I’m a sexually mature woman of power and confidence.

C.S. LEWIS: Ah! Kill it, lion Jesus!

May 6, 2008

idea for a lit essay

Filed under: writing — Tags: , , , , , , , — Paul Crittenden @ 7:11 pm

Back when I was in college at UAB I took a Shakespeare course taught by my favorite professor, Dr. Stephen Glosecki. (I also, based on my experience in Shakespeare, ended up taking his Literature of the Vikings course.) During our discussions of Macbeth we talked about Lady Macbeth as an example of the femme fatale archetype. When we got to Hamlet we talked about how Ophelia is Lady Macbeth’s polar opposite. Lady Macbeth drives her husband to murder and madness while Ophelia assumes a proxy-type role for Hamlet and takes his madness on herself, eventually collapsing under the pressure and committing suicide. Ophelia goes insane with grief so that Hamlet doesn’t have to, allowing him to move forward soberly with his plans for revenge. Notice how Hamlet is able to pretty much hold it together until Ophelia’s death. Without his proxy he has no choice but to fall prey to the madness that he’s been feigning since deciding to get revenge on Claudius.

In an essay I wrote for the class I used the term “femme vitale” in describing Ophelia. Glosecki’s note in red was “great term – coin it!” When I wrote the paper I just assumed it was a real literary term. It sounded like it should be. Surely I wasn’t the first to use it. Since then, though, I’ve never come across it. So I figure I need to take Dr. Glosecki’s note to heart before somebody else has the idea.

It would be a fun essay to research and explore. I could pull in film noir and detective fiction and really just have a blast with it. My only is that it’s not exactly a feminist idea. I mean I’m talking about women who sacrifice themselves so that their men can acheive something. I’ll have to think about this…

March 28, 2008

Arkansas by John Brandon (2008)

Filed under: books — Tags: , , , , , — Paul Crittenden @ 3:39 am

The Coen Brothers have made a nice career out of crafting stories about guys who are not nearly as smart as they think they are. Folks whose plans are not nearly as airtight as they need should be. Folks who don’t have nearly the power they think they do. In his debut novel Arkansas, John Brandon creates some characters who would fit perfectly in a Coen Brothers movie. Brandon’s tight story also reminds me of the whole Southern Gothic thing (Flannery O’Connor, Cormac McCarthy) and the fine crime novel style of Elmore Leonard. He also manages to throw in a few experimental flourishes that don’t seem to bog the narrative down but rather elucidate it.

Here we have Swin and Kyle, two men who back into jobs in the drug trade in the rural South. Their improbable rise to the lower echelons of narcotics distribution finds them working for a fake Ranger in an Arkansas State Park. They drive for a man named Bright who in turn gets packages from a mysterious woman who goes by the name of “Her.” The ultimate power in the small backwoods drug ring is held by Frog, yet another foolhardy type. We learn of Frog’s rise to the top of his game (which really isn’t all that far up, to tell the truth) in some interstitial chapters written in second person.

Brandon makes all of these characters seem real and you find yourself rooting for Swin and Kyle even though you get the feeling from pretty early on that their story will not end nicely. Then the bodies start piling up and what little center there is obviously cannot hold. The sympathy is ratcheted up when Swin gets his girlfriend pregnant and the three try to make a semblance of a normal life. Brandon makes Swin an intelligent (if not too clever) wannabe family man who is more than a little self-centered. He fears that the sisters he left in Kentucky will miss him so much that they will become strippers for lack of a decent male role model. The truth is they are doing just fine without Swin. His partner Kyle is the real criminal of the two. Kyle doesn’t pretend to be smart but he thinks he knows how to live outside the law. The two bring out the best and the worst in the each other. Mostly the worst.

Brandon does a fine job detailing the land of Razorback football and shady trailer parks. With a debut as strong as this, I expect great things from John Brandon. I highly recommend Arkansas. Read it now so you can impress your friends when the Coen Brothers version wins Best Picture.

Arkansas is published by McSweeney’s Books and can be bought here.

January 10, 2008

call for links and another new idea

Filed under: The Internet — Tags: , , — Paul Crittenden @ 9:16 pm

If any of you kind folks know of some good links to websites about writing, reading, books in general, music, movies, etc that aren’t listed on the right under “blogroll” or “del.icio.us,’ let me know. I’m something of a research geek.

January 9, 2008

A Trip to the Stars by Nicholas Christopher (2001)

Filed under: books — Tags: , , , , , , — Paul Crittenden @ 7:19 pm

I wish I had written it. I could give a story higher praise but not much. A Trip to the Stars is an extremely engaging, well-researched story with a lively cast of unforgettable characters.

The plot spans the 15 years from 1965 to 1980 and travels from NewYork City to Las Vegas to Vietnam to a series of islands scattered all over the globe.The two main characters are Enzo Samax and his adopted aunt Mala Revell. (Who begin the book with the names Loren and Alma Revell, respectively.) Their story begins in a planetarium in New York City and will end in a Hawaiian planetarium – which should give a clue as to the importance of symmetry, coincidence, and all things stellar in this novel. While at the observatory 10 year old Loren is kidnapped, completely devastating his 20 year old aunt and sending her on a search that will end up changing her in surprising and fantastic ways.

In alternating chapters we are given first-person accounts of Loren and Alma and what happens to them over the next decade and a half. Alma of course searches frantically for Loren but the trail is stone cold. She barely knows Loren herself but found herself the boy’s only guardian after his adopted parents and then grandmother died. After coming to terms with the fruitlessness of her search and with a deep sense of guilt, she changes her name to Mala Revell, enlists in the Army as an x-ray technician and goes to Vietnam even though she has moral misgivings about the war itself. It is there that she meets and then loses the love of her life. She then dives deep into despair and tries to assuage her guilt and depression over losing two loved ones.She spirals into a life of alcohol and drugs while island-hopping around the South Pacific and even serves some time as a mind reader’s assistant.

Loren meanwhile finds out that his “kidnapper” is actually his uncle – his real uncle, a man by the name of Junius Samax. Samax tells the boy that his real name is Enzo and offers him a chance live in his uncle’s austere Hotel Canopus outside Las Vegas. Loren is told that a letter explaining what happened will be sent to his aunt – a letter which never gets delivered. Since Loren is precocious enough to realize that his young aunt cannot really afford to make a life for both of them he figures that living with his uncle would be the best idea for all concerned. Living in the Hotel Canopus Loren begins going by the name on his birth certificate, Enzo, and finds himself in a truly magical place peopled with exotic characters. Over the years he learns about his mother but of his father little or nothing is known.

The main theme of the novel is the search for lost people, places, or things. Enzo searches for his father, Mala searches first for Enzo then for her lover Geza Cassiel, and other characters search for such far-flung things as Atlantis, a lost moon pendant, vampires, and even the dark side of the moon. The novel’s symbology is primarily concerned with, as I mentioned earlier, astronomy and even delves into astrology and other supernatural things. Christopher has no qualms in making the numinous real. After separate spider bites both Enzo and Mala present with supernaturally heightened senses for a while. And Mala goes through a phase where she can share a person’s memories as that person is having them. Not to mention that coincidences occur with a precision that makes one think that the invisible hand of fate is directing events.

In fact the frequency of coincidences is my only real gripe with the novel. One or two occurrences at the end of the story stretched my suspension of disbelief to the breaking point in a deus ex machina kind of way. But honestly, these characters are so believable that I can almost assume they really do have some sort of latent supernatural power so that events seem to bend around them.

Even with that caveat I would definitely recommend this novel to anyone looking for a good read. I got emotionally involved with these people, even the ancillary characters and never once got tired of reading about them. And really, what more could you ask for in a novel?

December 30, 2007

The 2 Questions and “Puss in Boots”

Filed under: writing — Tags: , , , — Paul Crittenden @ 2:34 am

Much of this post is cut and pasted from an old myspace blog. Some of you (Magggie) may recall it.

My creative writing teacher Dennis Covington once told me that there are two important questions that all good stories ask. Those two questions are Who is the Father? and Who owns the land? “Puss in Boots” (PiB) fits into this mold quite nicely.

If you’ve never heard me wax deconstructively re: the 2 questions here’s the idea in a nutshell:

We can always know who our mother is. It’s always possible to know with 100% certainty which woman birth to you. However, you can never know with the same kind of certainty who your father is. All you have to go by is the word of your mother. This brings up all sorts of neat little existential questions that literature (at least good literature) can try to answer.

And land is the only thing that we can really own. Having a place to make a home is the only thing of real substance that one generation can pass on the next. Everything else is temporary.

So we come to PiB. The father is dead. He has dispersed his land among all of his children. Except you. What you get is seemingly worthless. One way of looking at PiB (at least the first part) is as a quest to find out what your father really thought about you. Of course since he’s dead no answer is going to go beyond speculation. Or is it? What if the man had a hidden plan to give you everything – all you had to do was prove to everybody else what he had an inkling of – namely that you’re worth the whole kit and kaboodle. The plan would have to be hidden because he knew that your other siblings would tamper with the will anyway and see to it that you received nothing (or effectively so in any case). Now you have to use your intelligence, guile, faith in humanity, compassion, and keen sense of what a person is really worth (oh, and the cat) in a quest to win back what is rightfully yours.

At least that’s where I’d like to take the idea.

December 27, 2007

The New Idea

Filed under: writing — Tags: , , , — Paul Crittenden @ 4:31 am

The idea is a rif fon “Puss in Boots.” A very well-to-do young man finds out his father has diedin mysterious circumstances. The young man discovers that because of the machinations of his three siblings he has basically been written out of the will. He is left with only one serving girl from a supposedly primitive society. A daughter of a slave that was a spoil from a war his father fought in when he was the young man’s age. The serving girl remebers the young man as having been the only member of the household to treat her kindly but nevertheless, he was one of her captors. She makes him a bargain: she will help him regain his fortune and title, get revenge on his siblings, and find out who killed his father in return for her freedom.

The serving girl might also have other reasons to help our hero: I am toying with the idea that she was raped by one of our hero’s brothers. Perhaps she is pregnant. But I don’t want to gild the lily.

She is from a seemingly primitive desert-dwelling society. They are nomadic and much more in tune with the earth than our hero’s more “civilized” people. Definitely reminiscent of the Middle East. Maybe there’s even a tradition of magic tied to the earth and its cycles. Lots of talk about the sun and the moon and the seasons. Wicca stuff.

My feeling right now is to have them fall in love during the course of the story. I suppose it would be natural and it would raise the stakes for the ending.

The moral will concern the evil of keeping someone against their will – the evil of keeping political prisoners. Maybe a little lofy but I don’t think the story will be heavy-handed. At least I’ll try my best.

Here is a synopsis of Charles Perrault’s version of the Puss in Boots story from wikipedia:

“The division of property after a miller’s death leaves his youngest son with nothing but the granary cat. Disappointed, the son contemplates eating the animal, but the cat bargains with him, promising him riches in return for a bag and a pair of boots. Though dubious, the miller’s son goes along with him and provides the items.

Puss-in-Boots takes the bag and catches a succession of items of game – rabbits, partridges, etc. – which he takes to the palace and presents to the king as presents from his master, the ‘Marquis de Carabas‘. Eventually the cat learns that the king and his beautiful daughter will be travelling by the river road. Puss-in-Boots tells the miller’s son (who is ignorant of all this) to go and bathe in the river at the time that the royal party is due to pass. The boy does so, and as he bathes the cat steals his clothes, and runs to the road calling for help for his master, the Marquis de Carabas, who is drowning. The boy is “rescued” from the river, and his lack of clothes is explained as the work of robbers. He is therefore wrapped in rich robes and driven off in the king’s coach.

The cat speeds ahead of the king’s party to the lands of a powerful ogre. He threatens the people working in its fields that they will be chopped to bits if they don’t say that the fields belong to the Marquis of Carabas. As the king’s coach reaches the ogre’s lands, the king asks after the ownership of the fields, and is told that they belong to the Marquis de Carabas. Puss-in-Boots goes ahead of the party, and confronts the ogre. He flatters the ogre on his magical shape-changing abilities and challenges him to turn into a mouse. The moment the ogre does so, Puss-in-Boots eats him, thus claiming the palace and lands in his master’s name.

Upon reaching the ogre’s palace, the royal party is welcomed by Puss-in-Boots in his master’s name. The king marries the princess to the miller’s son.

Puss became a personage of great importance, and gave up hunting mice, except for amusement.”

What I will do is change the gender of Puss and sort of spread the story out a little. Try to make it a little darker.

One of the reasons I like this story so much is because Puss is a trickster figure. I’ve always been drawn to trickster figures in fiction – ever since being introduced to possibly the best example of the trickster the twentieth century produced: Bugs Bunny. I have much to say about the Trickster character type. So much that I’ll not say anything else about it here.

I need to thank Paul Di Filippo for his story “Ailoura” which obviously gave me the idea for all of the above.

Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.